- theoretical theory
- real time practice
- reflection
- practical theory
March version:
At the beginning of this version I talk about the theories of Papert (constructionism, mathetics), Siemens (connectivism), Harel & Papert (ISDP) in a theoretical way. Nothing wrong with that. Having knowledge of these theories and having used some of them in the past in a practical manner was an important influence in developing the course which is the subject of my Cairns paper
September version:
Nevertheless, in the process of teaching the course and thinking about it the theoretical emphasis has changed. The theory is now mainly expressed in the three ideas section and the course dynamics section.
three ideas:
- ... programming is one of the best computer games ...
- ... we use language to author ourselves, assisted by many co-authors as we grow up
- eat your own dogfood
- teacher directed skill development and open ended exploration
- serious work and play
- doing and documenting
- individual and group work
- spoon feeding and eating your own dogfood
So, my approach does recognise the importance of theory as something that does cast a light to illuminate the future but also that theory has to return to practice, to be further enriched by practice and reformulated through that process
This process hasn't finished. I can look at the three ideas and the five dynamics and see the potential and need to develop them further. I'm not just talking about tweaking here either, it might involve significant conceptual restructure too. The theory practice cycle never ends. Learning evolves.
Related reading:
ascending from the abstract to the concrete
feedback as truth seeking
2 comments:
I like "eat your own dog food" Bill - and wish I was coming to Cairns like the rest of NZ ICT educators so that I could enjoy this thinking in person
I am reading the 23 September New Scientist - "Is he thinking what you're thinking" Andy Coghlan -
There is a classic insight into identity loss or a metaphor for how knowing yourself as a learner can be compromised by school - seems that when you "treat a dog with antibiotics you risk killing the bacteria that live in its anal sac and produce the individual scent by which it is recognisable to other dogs."
Is not intentional identity theft is an act borne of our failure to see life from a dogs perspective -
The URL to the New Scientist article which arti refers to is, Animal welfare: See things from their perspective
What a wonderful extension to the "eat your own dogfood" metaphor
Post a Comment