I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Standard Model 4: Quantum Physics
-
This is a crash course in quantum physics! In a self-contained way, I
explain quantum states and the basic rule for computing probabilities. It
was a fun c...
Anthropic and the Pentagon
-
OpenAI is in and Anthropic is out as a supplier of AI technology for the US
defense department. This news caps a week of bluster by the highest
officials...
Possible brief slowdown in posting
-
I need a life—even if that is a life outside of writing for this website.
That’s by way of informing you that posting here may be a bit light for
about a w...
-
It seems to me that LinkedIn is enshittifying their internal search. In the
past weeks I frequently don’t get any results when searching for someone I
met ...
Moar Updatez
-
To start on a somber note: those of us at UT Austin are in mourning this
week for Savitha Shan, an undergrad double major here in economics and
information...
Negotiations as Cover, War as Policy
-
A sweeping analysis of the U.S.–Israel strike on Iran and the economic
chain reaction now in motion. The discussion tracks oil chokepoints,
insurance and...
Mass surveillance, red lines, and a crazy weekend
-
[These are my own opinions, and not representing OpenAI. Crossposted on
Lesswrong] AI has so many applications, and AI companies have limited
resources and...
A transcendent vision for US energy policy
-
Watch now | A recent podcast appearance on how both major parties can work
together to create enduring, positive change on energy policy.
Things Change
-
*In periods of uncommon volatility, crises and transitions manifest in
unexpected ways. *
*Things change, sometimes tumultuously.* The unevenness of chang...
Notes on the Fermi Paradox
-
I recently realized I hadn’t written much in this blog about the Fermi
Paradox, though I do write about it elsewhere. So here is a quick note. The
Fermi Pa...
A New Explanation for Tariffs and Bombings
-
Because of energy-related shortages that are already being encountered,
national economies are beginning to act like the players in a game of
musical chair...
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
The Grand Illusion: The US – Europe Growth Gap
-
from Dean Baker There is a widely told story among elite pundit types that
the US economy is soaring ahead, and Europe’s economy is mired in
stagnation. As...
SIGCSE 2026: Love and learning
-
[image: A brick, circular, windowed facade against a cloudy, sunny morning
dawn.]The America’s Center convention center.
I didn’t want to go to St. Louis t...
ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINE WAR, 2026
-
Bill Kerr Q&A format: What is the situation on the battlefield? The
situation changes everyday. To keep up to date follow some of the links
here to regular...
Processing JSON with Kafka Connect
-
In this post, I’ll share examples of how to process JSON data in a Kafka
Connect pipeline, and explain the schema format that Kafka uses to describe
JSON e...
Mankind versus YHWH-Elohim
-
Your Honor, this Complaint seeks declaratory and equitable relief on the
ground that the Edenic Covenant was structurally defective ab
initio—lacking infor...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment