I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Bill Maher on deranged Republicans
-
I missed this Bill Maher “New Rules” clip from last October, but better
late than never. In this segment called “Crazy in gov,” Maher assesses
whether Dem...
Rewiring Democracy Ebook is on Sale
-
I just noticed that the ebook version of *Rewriring Democracy* is on sale
for $5 on Amazon, Apple Books, Barnes & Noble, Books A Million, Google Play,
Ko...
Washington’s Arctic Power Play
-
At Davos 2026, Richard Wolff and Michael Hudson analyse Trump’s Greenland
strategy, NATO tensions, Europe’s dilemma, and the deeper shift from US
dominan...
Roundup #77: The Fix-Everything Button
-
BART fare gates; AI and jobs, again; Tariffs and trade deficits; Jon
Stewart vs. the economists; H-1Bs; Japan's fiscal position
I guess we’re doing Moon factories now
-
A quick note collating a list of blogs I’ve written on the topic. I’ll
update it with good third party write ups as I become aware of them.
Context: SpaceX...
A good history of NASA’s Mercury program
-
Jackson Tyler produced another really good documentary, this time on NASA’s
first space program, Project Mercury. I figure most people, if they’re
consciou...
Nate Soares visiting UT Austin tomorrow!
-
This is just a quick announcement that I’ll be hosting Nate Soares—who
coauthored the self-explanatorily titled If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies
with Eli...
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
Wasserspiel by Tim Staffel
-
This 2025 novel by German author Tim Staffel centers on the geopolitical
and commercial exploitation of water, in times where fresh water is getting
scarce...
The Myth of Libertarian Vs Authoritarian
-
Many have long described variation in political opinion in terms of two key
dimensions, described either as economic freedom and personal freedom, or
via r...
Interview with Doug Henwood
-
Had a very nice chat with Doug Henwood for his Behind the News podcast
about my new book, The Story of Capital. Listen on Doug’s site or Apple
Podcasts.
Trevisan Award for Expository Work
-
[Guest post by Salil Vadhan; Boaz’s note: I am thrilled to see this award.
Luca’s expository writing on his blog, surveys, and lecture notes was and
is an ...
Oxfam report on growing inequality in Sweden
-
from Lars Syll The 2026 Oxfam report, Our Unequal Sweden, issues a damning
indictment of the nation’s economic trajectory, systematically dismantling
the e...
Slag Field Ecology
-
Here’s a tale of how nature triumphs in the end. Steel mills dumped molten
slag in parts of Chicago and nearby areas. The slag hardened in layers up
to 5 m...
Mankind versus YHWH-Elohim
-
Your Honor, this Complaint seeks declaratory and equitable relief on the
ground that the Edenic Covenant was structurally defective ab
initio—lacking infor...
Michael Ovitz: The Business of Relationships
-
Michael Ovitz co-founded CAA and helped reshape Hollywood, then took the
same playbook into tech investing and advising founders. Public Release:
Februar...
How to explain Generative AI in the classroom
-
Generative AI is fast becoming an everyday tool across almost every field
and industry. Teaching children about it should include an understanding of
how i...
Some quick thoughts on Venezuela from a comrade
-
Some quick thoughts on Venezuela from a comrade: 1. Reuters confirms
agreement to divert Venezuela oil to US will not affect China much even
short term. On...
Update on Australian NetZero efforts
-
by Chris Morris People have queried what is happening in Australia with
their push for a decarbonised all renewables/ Net Zero grid since the last
update...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment