I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Inequality Then and Now: Now It's Too Late
-
*In refusing to recognize that inequality had the potential to bring down
the entire system, our delay has made that reckoning inevitable.*
*The theme her...
The Fellowship of the Duck
-
Unbeknownst to me, the powers that be in our department decided to
celebrate my creation of the Jerry Coyne/Honey the Duck Graduate Fellowship
(a grad-stud...
Introducing Generative AI into Code Clubs
-
I recently spoke at Clubs Conference about how Generative AI can be
introduced into Code Clubs. The recording is a little fuzzy, but still
watchable, I thi...
Quantum computing: too much to handle!
-
Tomorrow I’m headed to Berkeley for the Inkhaven blogging residency, whose
participants need to write one blog post per day or get kicked out. I’ll be
ther...
Digital Omnibus Leaked Proposals
-
Over at Netzpolitik two leaked draft texts for new EC proposals w.r.t. data
and digital legislation have been published. I’ve been reading them the
past da...
Armistice Day
-
114 years ago, the guns fell silent on the Western Front, marking a
temporary and partial end to the Great War which began in 1914, and has
continued, in o...
The Standard Model – Part 3
-
Physics is really bizarre and wonderful. Here I start explaining why the
Standard Model has U(1) × SU(2) × SU(3) as its symmetry group. But I don't
assume ...
Some musings on reality motivated by the age of AI
-
Is there anyone at home? Is the chess program on your phone conscious? Is
ChatGPT5 a conscious agent? Will ChatGPT9 be conscious? Most people would
answer ...
Thoughts by a non-economist on AI and economics
-
Crossposted on lesswrong Modern humans first emerged about 100,000 years
ago. For the next 99,800 years or so, nothing happened. Well, not quite
nothing. T...
Natural Selection of Bad Science. Part II
-
by John Ridgway In an earlier essay [1] I explained how positive feedbacks
can lead to potentially problematic scientific mono-cultures. I also
acknowled...
New book: The Story of Capital
-
My next book, The Story of Capital: What Everyone Should Know About How
Capital Works, will be published on 24 February 2026 by Verso.
The Final Step of the Scientific Method
-
An ideology that cannot be defended by means of evidence and deductive
logic, will inevitably be enforced by violence. You shall know them by
their habit: ...
Good News Ukraine.
-
Sorting out the real situation in the Russo Ukrainian war
https://billkerr1947.github.io/ukraineWar/ “Artillery Conquers, Infantry
Occupies” and drones are...
Supersonic electric flight
-
This post is inspired by the recent press release about the Rolls Royce
Accel, an experimental electric aircraft being built to attempt the
electric speed ...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment