I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Ghost the octopus died
-
This morning I woke up to this email from the Aquarium of the Pacific (I
suppose I’d signed up for communications a while back) announcing the death
of Gho...
Multipolar Oil Markets Are Now a Reality
-
Hudson & Wolff argue the Iran conflict is reversing decades of US strategy,
forcing reliance on sanctioned oil, destabilising petrodollar flows, and
expo...
Authenticity as Grace
-
Last week I realized that today’s rapid cultural evolution, mediated
greatly by youth movements, seems encouraged by the common modern norm
favoring “authe...
A day at the University of Minnesota
-
[image: Brick buildings on the left and right, a handful of students
walking down a pathway, and blue skies.]A sunny Monday at UMN.
Last Fall, I was once a...
Standard Model 7: Pions
-
This time I’m talking about pions: Pions were a revolutionary discovery in
the 1930s—part of the first wave of the ‘particle zoo’—but I’m explaining
them a...
A Rising New Era of Personal Tools
-
At PKM Summit this weekend one thing that stood out was that many have
started creating their own tools, and were using vibecoding to create them.
While th...
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
Talking at TechCon about AI and EDA
-
IBM TechCon is an annual online technical event for engineers, creators,
and integration specialists. One of our sessions for this year was AI
patterns in ...
Spring 2026 PCAS Update: Recruiting a new Lecturer
-
My last update on the University of Michigan’s Program in Computing for the
Arts and Sciences (PCAS) was in March 2024 (see post here). I did give some
upd...
Garmin watch faces
-
I have recently been using Claude Code (Opus 4.6) to do a variety of
software projects. One was the completion of an ill-fated attempt to create
a custom w...
Eating The Rich Won’t Fix Climate Change
-
The world’s richest 1% have more purchasing power, and hence more command
over what the economy produces than ordinary people. They can afford a more
ext...
Rethinking climate change
-
by Nicola Scafetta My new book is now published: The Frontier of Climate
Science: Solar Variability, Natural Cycles and Model Uncertainty For more
than t...
Mass surveillance, red lines, and a crazy weekend
-
[These are my own opinions, and not representing OpenAI. Crossposted on
Lesswrong] AI has so many applications, and AI companies have limited
resources and...
A New Explanation for Tariffs and Bombings
-
Because of energy-related shortages that are already being encountered,
national economies are beginning to act like the players in a game of
musical chair...
ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINE WAR, 2026
-
Bill Kerr Q&A format: What is the situation on the battlefield? The
situation changes everyday. To keep up to date follow some of the links
here to regular...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment