I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
The Perverse Incentives Dominating Our Lives
-
*The net result of these perverse incentives is an Internet that is
increasingly toxic and untrustworthy. *
*Perverse incentives are funny things.* Even t...
2026 update: modifications of Da Roolz
-
I haven’t had a look at Da Roolz (the commenting rules) for a while, and,
having a gander, made one modification in them, as well as a change in the
instru...
AI & Humans: Making the Relationship Work
-
Leaders of many organizations are urging their teams to adopt agentic AI to
improve efficiency, but are finding it hard to achieve any benefit.
Managers ...
Deindustrialisation Meets Coercion
-
GLENN DIESEN: Welcome back to the show. We are joined today by Professor
Michael Hudson to discuss the U.S. national security strategy and the
unravelin...
The Goodness Cluster
-
The blog-commenters come at me one by one, a seemingly infinite supply of
them, like masked henchmen in an action movie throwing karate chops at
Jackie Cha...
Christian Cultural Drift
-
Re civ decline, my basic story is that a key contribution to the fall of
civilizations is plausibly that as a civ gets big, rich, and peaceful, its
local c...
Rediscovering justice in economics
-
from Asad Zaman and WEA Pedagogy Blog This post summarizes the first five
chapters (through Chapter 5A) of Alasdair MacIntyre’s Whose Justice? Which
Ration...
AI models and their “knowledge” of climate change
-
by Joe Nalven Towards improving AI architecture with a new paradigm Several
years ago, I asked Bard (Google’s predecessor to Gemini) to craft an
algorith...
What are the odds of US democracy surviving Trump?
-
TL;DR Not good. Taking account of economic failure, nothing Trump has done
– rape, war crimes, corruption, insurrection, ICE or trashing the
constitution –...
2025 in music (last.fm)
-
Spotify has data for most music I choose to listen to – on my computer, my
phone, in the car, on smart speakers, etc. So Spotify’s end of year review
is mo...
Five F-words for 2026
-
[image: A messy brown overhead view with green tendrils and five capital
F’s at different orientations strewn about.]Blighted soil can be healed,
but not w...
The Tonnetz
-
Harmony in music is the dance of rational and irrational numbers, coming
close enough to kiss but never touching. This image by my friend Gro-Tsen
illustra...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
2026: Expect a very uneven world economic downturn
-
The Maximum Power Principle strongly suggests that even as limits are hit,
the world economy cannot be expected to collapse all at once. Instead, the
most ...
A good summation of the VPRI STEPS project
-
I learned about STEPS from the ViewPoints Research Institute (VPRI) in
about 2008. It’s goal was to create a usable office system, from the ground
up (incl...
Energy Predictions 2025
-
Printable pdf. It’s been a few years since I wrote a broad post on energy,
so I’m providing an update in one easy to read place. More detailed
specific pos...
Harvey at 90: A Verso Series
-
From the Verso website: This month, in honour of David Harvey‘s ninetieth
birthday, we’re publishing a series of short essays on David’s unparalleled
contr...
Thoughts by a non-economist on AI and economics
-
Crossposted on lesswrong Modern humans first emerged about 100,000 years
ago. For the next 99,800 years or so, nothing happened. Well, not quite
nothing. T...
The Final Step of the Scientific Method
-
An ideology that cannot be defended by means of evidence and deductive
logic, will inevitably be enforced by violence. You shall know them by
their habit: ...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment