I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
The riots in Europe. . .
-
. . . seem to be getting worse. What started out as relatively peaceful
protests against poor school conditions have devolved into full-scale
rioting compl...
Training AIs to Solve CAPTCHAs
-
Interesting research:
*Abstract*: Vision-language models (VLMs) can solve visual CAPTCHAs without
task-specific training, but the agents built on them ap...
What Will Exporters Accept Instead of Dollars?
-
Selling oil is one thing. Getting paid in something you can use is another.
A country can run a trade surplus and still find itself holding another
gover...
Why Might Aliens Visit Earth?
-
I did a web search on the above phrase, in prep for a podcast, and in ten
pages of results didn’t find anything I thought reasonable.
Norwegian Book Shopping
-
To me the variety of languages in Europe is highly valuable, something to
cherish. Even if in practice it also provides many hurdles, in order to
bridge la...
Truth Be Told
-
*The ultimate truth is revealing the truth of the situation and our
feelings about it are a relief, and the starting point to moving forward in
a positive ...
AI – for whom?
-
Artificial intelligence is commonly presented as either a technological
miracle or an existential threat. Yet the most immediate question is
political: who...
Podcasts about the Topic
-
“The Topic” being, of course, the Mathocalypse, except sometimes with AI
alignment and even quantum computing and complexity theory and other stuff
thrown ...
Ryan Serhant: How to Get People to Say Yes
-
Ryan Serhant is a real estate broker, founder of SERHANT., and star of
Bravo’s Million Dollar Listing New York and Netflix’s Owning Manhattan.
Public Rel...
How deep is Tulainyo Lake?
-
Regular readers may recall that I put a visit to Tulainyo Lake on my bucket
list a few years ago. Last week I did it. Impossibly remote, otherworldly
beaut...
Flawed premises in AI doomerism
-
[image: A stack of wavy lines, some more angular waves, a vertical barrier,
lots of pastel ellipses, and a brown ground, with a mechanical flower in
the mi...
Trump Is Definitely Considering Nuking Iran
-
Source: Hotpot.aiTrump is in a tight spot with the Iran war and needs to
find a way out before the midterms. A tactical nuclear strike on Iran's
nuclear ...
Climate Etc. is now an archive
-
Climate Etc. closed in June 2026 and this site is preserved as a read-only
archive. This feed will not update again -- visit the homepage for where to
find...
Some thoughts about Bondi
-
Why did it happen? I think that the combination of four factors (listed
below) was close to a sufficient cause. Sufficient at least to make a
terrorist att...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment