I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Savannah: Day 4 (food orgy)
-
Without a doubt, the most famous “restaurant” in Savannah is Mrs. Wilkes
Dining Room, formerly known as Mrs. Wilkes’ Boarding House (the apostrophe
seems t...
Press Roundup from Mexico City
-
La acelerada producción del capitalismo provoca deshumanización y deterioro
ambiental: David Harveypor Sebastián Campos RiveraBuzos de la noticiaAbr
15, 20...
Hormuz Is Leverage
-
Michael Hudson explains how Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz has
shifted global power, turning oil transit into leverage that could trigger
a dee...
Power Futarchy
-
A simple way to apply futarchy to for-profit firms is profit-futarchy: make
markets that estimate total firm market value given key firm choices, like
who ...
Australian Dynamism
-
This post has benefited from generous contributions from Austin Vernon,
Malcolm Davis, Sam D’Amico, and others who do not necessarily endorse the
conclusio...
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
Three greats who we’ve lost
-
Sir Charles Antony Richard Hoare (1934-2026) won the 1980 Turing Award for
numerous contributions to computer science, including foundational work on
concu...
Kindle Unlimited Exclusivity
-
Since the start of last year I have not been spending any money at Amazon.
I’ve been happily buying my reading elsewhere. Today for the first time I
ran in...
CHI 2026 trip report: ay ay AI
-
[image: wood latices hanging from the ceiling of a beige foyer.]The foyer
lattice of the International Barcelona Convention Center
There is never a good ti...
Feldspars
-
Returning from a trip to New Mexico to explore some Puebloan ruins, I
picked up this beautiful chunk of labradorite in the town of Quartzsite.
This miner...
Retracing steps
-
This is sort of a follow-up to the My journey series. In that, I talked
about learning programming on 8-bit computers, and progressing onto much
more power...
Spring 2026 PCAS Update: Recruiting a new Lecturer
-
My last update on the University of Michigan’s Program in Computing for the
Arts and Sciences (PCAS) was in March 2024 (see post here). I did give some
upd...
Rethinking climate change
-
by Nicola Scafetta My new book is now published: The Frontier of Climate
Science: Solar Variability, Natural Cycles and Model Uncertainty For more
than t...
ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINE WAR, 2026
-
Bill Kerr Q&A format: What is the situation on the battlefield? The
situation changes everyday. To keep up to date follow some of the links
here to regular...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment