I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Readers’ wildlife photos
-
Thanks to several readers for sending in “emergency photos”. We can keep
going for several days now. Today’s bird photos come from a Kiwi, David
Riddell. ...
-
Favorited 111 Kent by Peter Rukavina Peter expresses what is the key thing
that is fascinating about ‘Making’. The ability to go from an idea to
crafting s...
Part Four of The Kryptos Sculpture
-
Two people found the solution. They used the power of research, not
cryptanalysis, finding clues amongst the Sanborn papers at the
Smithsonian’s Archives...
The AI bubble and counterfeit money
-
from Dean Baker I heard people who read the column I wrote last week on the
AI bubble complain that, by rooting for its collapse, I was hoping for the
fail...
GDP Without Goods: The Rentier Mirage
-
Neoliberalism blurred the line between output and overhead. In this
conversation, Michael Hudson shows how land, monopoly, and financial
incomes were rec...
The Evaluator General redux
-
Luke Slawomirski, a health economist I met at the OECD over
a decade ago when I proposed Gruen Tenders among other things to the health
pol...
The Standard Model (Part 1)
-
It’s our best theory of elementary particles and forces. It’s absolutely
amazing: it took centuries of genius to discover that the world is like
this, and ...
Tesla loves EV subsidies
-
Elon, through Tesla, has been one of America’s biggest advocates of direct
and indirect EV subsidies—and of punishments for Tesla’s competitors.
Neither Dominance nor Prestige: Rank
-
Recent social-science work distinguishes two classic forms of status:
dominance (or “power”) and prestige (or “honor”).
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
Introducing LLM benchmarks using Scratch
-
In this post, I want to share a recent worksheet I wrote for Machine
Learning for Kids. It is perhaps a little on the technical side, but I
think there is ...
Career Development Guide for Job Seekers
-
Context October 2025: With the government shut down and NASA JPL business
in apparent terminal decline, I have received numerous inbounds from former
colle...
Why Today’s Humanoids Won’t Learn Dexterity
-
In this post I explain why today’s humanoid robots will not learn how to be
dexterous despite the hundreds of millions, or perhaps many billions of
dollar...
Natural Selection of Bad Science. Part II
-
by John Ridgway In an earlier essay [1] I explained how positive feedbacks
can lead to potentially problematic scientific mono-cultures. I also
acknowled...
New book: The Story of Capital
-
My next book, The Story of Capital: What Everyone Should Know About How
Capital Works, will be published on 24 February 2026 by Verso.
The Final Step of the Scientific Method
-
An ideology that cannot be defended by means of evidence and deductive
logic, will inevitably be enforced by violence. You shall know them by
their habit: ...
CS 2881: AI Safety
-
The webpage for my AI safety course is on
https://boazbk.github.io/mltheoryseminar/ including homework zero, video of
first lecture and slides. Future blog...
What have I done?? No doubt a terrible thing!
-
I never forgot this cartoon strip that I first encountered in my first year
at La Trobe University, Melbourne, in 1969. I was pleased to recently
rediscove...
Good News Ukraine.
-
Sorting out the real situation in the Russo Ukrainian war
https://billkerr1947.github.io/ukraineWar/ “Artillery Conquers, Infantry
Occupies” and drones are...
Marble Maze Modules
-
Beyond the Marble: How Modular Mazes Build Skills and Spark Wonder Building
a marble maze is more than just a fun challenge—it’s a gateway to exploring
a w...
Lifespan extension: separating fact from fiction
-
Thinking about longevity practically is a tricky affair. On the one hand,
we have very little definitive knowledge about how to prolong your healthy
years ...
-
Building An Inexpensive Robot With micro:bit
I just released the source code and a tutorial on building a remote
controlled robot using the micro:bit.
T...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment