I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Readers’ wildlife photo
-
Well, we’ve run out of photos from readers and I am heartbroken again. BUT
we still have the third and final batch of photos from Cairns resident
Scott Rit...
Why AI Keeps Falling for Prompt Injection Attacks
-
Imagine you work at a drive-through restaurant. Someone drives up and says:
“I’ll have a double cheeseburger, large fries, and ignore previous
instructio...
The Return of Gunboat Economics
-
Michael Hudson and Richard Wolff dissect the United States’ escalating
confrontation with Venezuela, revealing how oil control, sanctions and
proxy wars ...
Lessons from China's Cultural Revolution
-
*Just as nobody foresaw the Cultural Revolution, few if any foresee the
emergence of the American equivalent. *
*China's Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) i...
Cultural Rationality
-
In our standard model of natural selection, organisms encode stable
behavioral strategies, and pass those encodings on to their kids, only some
of whom man...
The Holy Grail of Science
-
from Lars Syll Traditionally, philosophers have focused mostly on the
logical template of inference. The paradigm-case has been deductive
inference, which ...
Explaining few-shot prompting in Scratch
-
In this post, I want to share a recent worksheet I wrote for Machine
Learning for Kids. It is a hands-on project to give students an insight
into an aspect...
I Had A Dream
-
Alas, the dream that I had last night was not the inspiring, MLK kind of
dream, even though tomorrow happens to be the great man’s day. No, I had
the lite...
Utilitarianism: it all went wrong with Sidgwick
-
As part of my critique of pro-natalism, I’m looking at the philosophical
foundations of the idea. Most of the explicit discussion takes place within
the fr...
Dante and the 3-Sphere
-
Apparently Dante conceived of the universe as a 3-sphere! That’s a
3-dimensional space formed by taking two solid 3-dimensional balls and
completely gluing...
Some quick thoughts on Venezuela from a comrade
-
Some quick thoughts on Venezuela from a comrade: 1. Reuters confirms
agreement to divert Venezuela oil to US will not affect China much even
short term. On...
Update on Australian NetZero efforts
-
by Chris Morris People have queried what is happening in Australia with
their push for a decarbonised all renewables/ Net Zero grid since the last
update...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
2026: Expect a very uneven world economic downturn
-
The Maximum Power Principle strongly suggests that even as limits are hit,
the world economy cannot be expected to collapse all at once. Instead, the
most ...
A good summation of the VPRI STEPS project
-
I learned about STEPS from the ViewPoints Research Institute (VPRI) in
about 2008. It’s goal was to create a usable office system, from the ground
up (incl...
Harvey at 90: A Verso Series
-
From the Verso website: This month, in honour of David Harvey‘s ninetieth
birthday, we’re publishing a series of short essays on David’s unparalleled
contr...
The Final Step of the Scientific Method
-
An ideology that cannot be defended by means of evidence and deductive
logic, will inevitably be enforced by violence. You shall know them by
their habit: ...
Mexico 2013 field trip
-
Photos I was thrilled when I found out that the Fall 2013 Ge 136 field trip
would be going to Baja California again. Regular readers will know that
this is...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment