An Open Letter to all Federal and State Ministers of Education
In a recent article in the Australian
(“Bell tolls for classroom reform”, 12/12/12), Geoff
Masters, Chief Executive of the Australian Council for Educational Research is reported
as being extremely disappointed (as any Australian would be) at seeing Australia ranked
27th in the PIRLS international survey of children’s reading abilities, and quotes him as
urging that we should be looking at such questions as “How well are we teaching
reading? How well are we preparing teachers to teach reading?”
These are not new questions.
In March 2004, The Australian published an open letter addressed to Dr Brendan Nelson,
then Minister for Education, Science and Training, signed by 26 senior people in the
fields of psychology, education, speech pathology, audiology, and linguistics, expressing
concerns with literacy levels in Australian children and especially concerns with the way
in which reading was typically being taught in Australian schools. The letter asked the
Minister to commission a review of the approaches to reading instruction adopted in
Australian schools.
The Minister did so, instituting towards the end of 2004 a National Inquiry into the
Teaching of Literacy in Australia and particularly asking the Committee conducting this
inquiry to report on the current state of teacher education and the extent to which it
prepares teachers adequately for reading instruction. This Committee submitted its report
in December 2005. This Report and associated summaries of it has since been removed
from the Federal Government’s web site, but the material can still be read at the website
of the Australian Council for Educational Research: see Teaching Reading: Report and Recommendations
The Report made 20 recommendations. Several of these focussed on improving the
preparation of student teachers for being able to teach children how to read, since the
Committee had found clear evidence that this was currently inadequate. The Report was
favourably received by the Minister, and also by various national bodies concerned with
children’s reading difficulties, such as Learning Difficulties Australia. But none of the
Report’s 20 recommendations was ever acted upon. (In January 2006 Dr Nelson assumed
a new portfolio, so there was a new Minister for Education from that date; she did
respond to the Report, but not by acting on any of its recommendations.)
In June 2009 the Hon Bill Shorten, then Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and
Children’s Services, set up a Dyslexia Working Party to write a report for him proposing
a national agenda for action to assist people with dyslexia (difficulties in reading). This
report was submitted to him on January 10 2010. It can be obtained from Helping people with dyslexia: a national action agenda
The report made 19 recommendations for actions to deal with dyslexia in the Australian
population. One of these was that in all teacher-training courses teachers should be made
fully familiar with the research on how children learn to read, why some children find it
so difficult, and how such difficulties can best be treated.
In September 2012 the Dyslexia Working Party received a Federal Government response
to its report, over the signatures of the Minister for School Education, Early Childhood
and Youth and the Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities and Carers. This response
indicated that the Government proposed to take no action on any of the Working Party’s
19 recommendations.
So Federal Governments have known about this problem for nearly a decade, and have
received advice from two independent committees of investigation about how to deal
with the problem. This advice has been ignored.
And so the results from PIRLS showing that so many Australian children are now very
poor readers, though certainly disappointing, are not surprising to anyone who examines
what happens in schools, and compares it to what research has clearly shown to be
effective in promoting successful reading development. The 2005 National Inquiry into
the Teaching of Literacy (NITL) pointed to, and urged us to follow, the direction towards
evidence-based practice taken recently in both Great Britain and the USA following
national reports compiled by eminent experts in reading development. However, little
productive change has eventuated at the policy level, much less at the classroom level.
Indeed if the recommendations of the NITL were adopted, wholesale retraining of
teachers would be necessary to provide them with the understanding of literacy not
presented to them in their own teacher training.
We have significant problems in education from the beginning stages, in that we do not
teach reading well. We do not use approaches known to be effective in initial reading
instruction. As a nation, we do not routinely screen students entering school for
underdeveloped pre-reading skills critical for facilitating learning to read, nor do we
monitor student progress in learning to read in a manner that allows for successful early
intervention with students failing to progress. We do not redress our early system failure
during the middle primary years. In the secondary years, we have a significant group of
disillusioned students who have lost contact with the curriculum because of these earlier
issues. We tend to focus attention and resources upon compensatory educational options
instead of emphasising the resolution of our earlier mistakes. The sequence of initial
failure-shame-frustration-disengagement-dropout is predictable and ongoing. Currently, it
is being addressed piecemeal, as if they were separate problems.
We need a vast shake-up at all levels of teacher training. By turning our gaze to
educational practices supported by empirical research we can make optimum use of our
resources to complete the task with effectiveness and efficiency.
We, as a group of concerned reading scientists, clinicians and educators, urge your
immediate attention to what has become a national disgrace.
Dr Caroline Bowen, Macquarie University and University of KwaZulu-Natal
Associate Professor Lesley Bretherton, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne
Associate Professor Mark Carter, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Professor Anne Castles, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University
Alison Clarke, Speech Pathologist, Melbourne
Emeritus Professor Max Coltheart, AM, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Macquarie
University
Associate Professor Elizabeth Conlon, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University
Professor Linda Cupples, Dept. of Linguistics, Macquarie University
Dr Molly de Lemos, Psychologist, Melbourne
Dr Janet Fletcher, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia
Dr Lorraine Hammond, School of Education, Edith Cowan University
Dr Kerry Hempenstall, Discipline of Psychology, RMIT
Associate Professor Virginia Holmes, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences,
University of Melbourne
Dr Coral Kemp, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Dr Saskia Kohnen, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University
Dr Suze Leitão, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University
Dr Wayne Levick, Learning Disorders Clinic, John Hunter Children’s Hospital,
Newcastle
Dr Alison Madelaine, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Associate Professor Frances Martin, School of Psychology, University of Newcastle
Dr Rebecca Mathews, The Australian Psychological Society
Dr Meredith McKague, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of
Melbourne
Yvonne Meyer, Committee Member, National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy
Mandy Nayton, Educational and Developmental Psychologist and President AUSPELD
Dr Roslyn Neilson, Speech Pathologist, Language, Speech & Literacy Services
Associate Professor Kristen Pammer, Research School of Psychology, The Australian
National University
Professor Chris Pratt, Australian College of Applied Psychology
Professor Margot Prior, AO, Dept. of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne
Dr Meree Reynolds, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Dr Tanya Serry, Dept. of Human Communication Sciences, La Trobe University
Dr Karen Smith-Lock, ARC Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders,
Macquarie University
David Stokes, The Australian Psychological Society
Dr Hua-Chen Wang, Dept. of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University
Emeritus Professor Kevin Wheldall, AM, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Dr Robyn Wheldall, Macquarie University Special Education Centre
Associate Professor Cori Williams, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin
University
Dr Craig Wright, Psychologist, Understanding Minds and Griffith University
- source
What If Solutions That Worked in the Past No Longer Fix What's Broken?
-
*You see the irony here: the more successful the old solutions were, the
greater our compulsion to cling to them even as they fail. *
*Humans use inductiv...
1 hour ago
No comments:
Post a Comment