I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Another break in Devon
-
Like last year, we went to Devon for a week before Easter. And like last
year, I used it as a chance to walk, forget work, and catch up on books,
games, an...
The Inevitability of the AI Depression
-
*The collision of hype and euphoric hallucinations with the real world will
manifest across the entire socio-economic-political-legal spectrum. *
*The con...
Neoliberal economics — a work of absurd fiction
-
from Lars Syll ‘Rigorous’ and ‘precise’ economic models cannot be
considered anything else than unsubstantiated conjectures as long as they
aren’t supporte...
Retracing steps
-
This is sort of a follow-up to the My journey series. In that, I talked
about learning programming on 8-bit computers, and progressing onto much
more power...
Interview: Cosmonaut Magazine podcast
-
The Marxist in Residence: an interview with David HarveyMarch 27, 2026 Ira
and Rudy join renowned geographer David Harvey for a chat on his pedagogy
and hi...
Vector Meson Dominance
-
I’m only now learning about ‘vector meson dominance’—a big idea put forth
by Sakurai and others around 1960. Here’s a family of 9 mesons called the
‘vector...
A day at the University of Minnesota
-
[image: Brick buildings on the left and right, a handful of students
walking down a pathway, and blue skies.]A sunny Monday at UMN.
Last Fall, I was once a...
Monday Message Board
-
Another Monday Message Board. Post comments on any topic. Civil discussion
and no coarse language please. Side discussions and idees fixes to the
sandpits,...
Spring 2026 PCAS Update: Recruiting a new Lecturer
-
My last update on the University of Michigan’s Program in Computing for the
Arts and Sciences (PCAS) was in March 2024 (see post here). I did give some
upd...
Garmin watch faces
-
I have recently been using Claude Code (Opus 4.6) to do a variety of
software projects. One was the completion of an ill-fated attempt to create
a custom w...
Eating The Rich Won’t Fix Climate Change
-
The world’s richest 1% have more purchasing power, and hence more command
over what the economy produces than ordinary people. They can afford a more
ext...
Rethinking climate change
-
by Nicola Scafetta My new book is now published: The Frontier of Climate
Science: Solar Variability, Natural Cycles and Model Uncertainty For more
than t...
ANALYSIS OF THE UKRAINE WAR, 2026
-
Bill Kerr Q&A format: What is the situation on the battlefield? The
situation changes everyday. To keep up to date follow some of the links
here to regular...
Predictions Scorecard, 2026 January 01
-
Nothing is ever as good as it first seems and nothing is ever as bad as it
first seems. — A best memory paraphrase of advice given to me by Vice
Admiral Jo...
1 comment:
I think the graph is accurate though I got a bit suspicious since it's comparing the Dow of 1929-'32 with the S&P 500 since then. Why not compare the Dow all the way along? It would show the same thing I think.
The graph does not give a full picture of economic crises. I noticed that the graph does not include the economic downturn from 1977-1984, but this is because the market only went down about 20% from 1977-1980. The market trended upward after that, but the way in which this period was significant was in unemployment, which trended upward starting in 1979, and peaked at 10.8% in 1982. This was the highest it had gotten to since the Great Depression. The highest the unemployment rate got to between 1973-'76 was about 9%.
Where we are now in the unemployment rate, 7.6%, is the same as the peak unemployment rate in 1992. Like the period from 1980-84, from 1990-'92 unemployment rose as the market went up.
We anticipate unemployment is going to get worse as the year progresses. This downturn is like the tech crash of 2000, in that unemployment is rising while the market goes down, though the unemployment rate was relatively mild from 2001-'03, reaching a peak of 6.3%. I can tell you it felt a lot worse than that in the field of work I'm in. It was a "tech depression" as far as we were concerned.
Post a Comment